International Comparative Legal Guide to Real Estate 2016

The International Comparative Legal Guides (ICLG) series by Global Legal Group provides “current and practical comparative legal
information on a range of practice areas.”

ICLG Real Estate 2016

The series covers 33 jurisdictions for real estate, and reviews different topics in real estate law, including ownership, real estate rights, system of registration, the registry or registries in a given jurisdiction, the real estate markets of such jurisdictions and the liabilities of buyers and sellers in real estate transactions.

New Balkans Law Office’ Partner Kamen Shoylev and Associate Irina Stoyanova were the authors of the Bulgarian chapter of ICLG Real Estate 2016.

Click here to read the ICLG Bulgarian Real Estate Chapter 2016.

This article appeared in the 2016 edition of The International Comparative Legal Guide to Real Estate, published by Global Legal Group Ltd, London.



Recent work:

NBLO helps Dutch investor win summary judgment in High Court for the sum of GBP 192,000

New Balkans Law Office has acted for Mr Kooter, the individual claimant in legal proceedings recently covered by the British press (e.g., The Evening Standard) and subsequently also in Bulgarian news media (e.g., 24 Chasa).

NBLO has represented Mr Kooter throughout the matter. We assisted with the enforcement of a worldwide freezing order issued by the High Court in London against real estate, bank account and other assets of the defendant situated in Bulgaria. As part of the attempts to preserving assets for enforcing his claim, the claimant also proceeded on the basis of prejudiced against him as a creditor. NBLO additionally acted on various ancillary aspects.

Separately, through one of NBLO’s partners who is dual-qualified as an English barrister, NBLO formed part of Mr Kooter’s UK legal team. In the UK, Mr Kooter won summary judgment for the sum of £192,000, interest and legal costs. The sum awarded was the entire claim by Mr Kooter relating to sums which Ms Radeva had ostensibly offered to invest on his behalf. For a separate part of the claim (approx. €36,000), the High Court was unable to give a summary (effectively, early-stage) judgment on the basis that unlike the investment related claim, the basis of these transfers could not be established without a full investigation of evidence including oral hearings.

Read More

© New Balkans Law Office 2020