Two further successes in court disputes on behalf of property investors in Bansko and Pamporovo

13 March 2014

In February 2014, New Balkans Law Office successfully completed two further property disputes between British-based individual buyers of Bulgarian properties and two major Bulgarian construction companies. The properties which were the subject of the disputes were near the ski resorts of Bansko and Pamporovo in the South of Bulgaria. One of the cases was heard by the Arbitration Court of the Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, while the other by the District Court of Haskovo.

Attorney Stoyan Petkov led NBLO’s dispute resolution team in these two cases.

The total size of our clients’ claims was in excess of EUR 320,000.

In both disputes, the defendants had failed to honour what they had agreed under contracts with the buyers, namely – had failed to complete all construction and finishing works on the contractual time schedule.

In one of the cases, the legal issues were aggravated by the interposition of an offshore company between the developer and the buyers, to which all payments of the purchase monies had been ordered over time. This posed complex issues of proof and causation under Bulgarian law. 

However, in both cases the judge and arbitrator honoured NBLO’s submissions via Mr Petkov on behalf of the Claimants and found in favour if the claimants.

New Balkans Law Office regularly acts for clients involved in real estate related disputes surrounding prior purchases of Bulgarian properties. We have a very strong track record of success in these property disputes, and have achieved favourable results for several hundred individuals since the mid-2000s when the booming interest and construction of Bulgarian property began.


Recent work:

A win in an insurance exclusion clause dispute at the Supreme Court

NBLO's dispute resolution team, led by Yordan Neshkov, secured a success against a large Bulgarian insurer in a claim brought on behalf of a UK national, who had lost her property in a fire. The insurer had refused to pay out under the insurance, on the grounds that a widely drawn clause in its general terms allegedly excused it from paying whenever there was a breach of building regulations, even if (as was accepted in this case) this breach was invisible externally, could not be discovered through reasonable investigation and was not caused by the insured. NBLO had good reasons to argue that this position was unsupported in the Bulgarian Insurance Code or civil law generally and persuaded the Supreme Cassation Court to back it. This is covered more fully in an article on our website.

© New Balkans Law Office 2018